BROADCAST PROTECTION DISCUSSION GROUP

HOME PAGE

 

June 6, 2002

 

BPDG REPORT {Full Report}

OCPS Compliance Rules

OCPS Term Sheet

OCPS - Philips

Tab A: 5C Presentation to CPTWG: Protecting Against Unauthorized Redistribution of Digital Broadcast Content by Intel, Hitachi, Matsushita, Sony and Toshiba - Nov. 28, 2002

Tab B: Draft Proposal and Work Plan for CPTWG "Broadcast Protection Discussion Group"

Tab C-1: Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document - Final Discussion Draft, June 3, 2002 (Requirements for the Protection of Unencrypted Digital Terrestrial Broadcast Content Against Unauthorized Redistribution)

Tab C-2: Table A to Requirements Document

Tab D: Rider X.2 Prepared by Certain MPAA Company Representatives to the BPDG Drafting Committee Discussion Draft -- February 15, 2002

Tab E: Rider X.2 Prepared by CE and IT Representatives to the BPDG Drafting Committee
Discussion Draft -- February 15, 2002

Tab F-1: 5C/MPAA/CIG Proposal Table A Criteria - April 25, 2002

Tab F-2: Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document - April 25, 2002 proposal by 5C/MPAA/CIG

Tab G: Philips Proposed Table A Criteria

Tab H-1: DTLA assertion of DTCP qualification for Table A

Tab H-2: DTCP Associated Obligations

Tab I-1: DCP assertion of HDCP qualification for Table A

Tab I-2: HDCP Associated Obligations

Tab J-1: 4C assertion of CPRM qualifications for Table A

Tab J-2: CPRM Associated Obligations

Tab K-1: JVC assertion of D-VHS qualifications for Table

Tab K-2: D-VHS Associated Obligations

Tab L-1: Microsoft assertion of Windows DRM qualifications for Table A

Tab L-2: Windows DRM Associated Obligations

Tab M-1: Philips assertion of OCPS qualifications for Table A

Tab M-2: OCPS Associated Obligations

Tab N-1: EFF Comments on April 25, 2002 Requirements Document

Tab O: Digimarc Comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report (May 28, 2002)

Tab P-01: WJRConsulting comments on May 21, 2002 Requirement Draft

Tab P-02: CableLabs comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report (May 24, 2002)

Tab P-03: Sharplabs comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report (May 29, 2002)

Tab P-04: Comments Submitted by Philips, Thomson and Zenith on the BPDG Co-Chairs' Report (May 29, 2002)

Tab P-05: Emails from VOSN, Sharp, DigitalConsumer.org, EFF, and Microsoft supporting the Philips, Thomson, and Zenith comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report

Tab P-06: Letter from CEA supporting "fair use" preamble to BPDG report (May 16, 2002)

Tab P-07: MPAA comments on the BPDG Co-Chairs' Report (May 17, 2002)

Tab P-08: MPAA Proposed revisions to Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document (May 29, 2002)

Tab P-09: 5C comments regarding MPAA proposed revisions to Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document (May 29, 2002)

Tab P-10: Zenith and Philips comments (separate emails) on MPAA proposed revisions to Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document (May 29, 2002)

Tab P-11: Sharp comments on Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document (re: deletion of "consumer"), and Philips note in support of Sharp's comment

Tab P-12: HRRC comment on f.n. 7 of Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document (re antitrust); Philips, Thomson and Zenith response to HRRC comment on f.n.7; DigitalConsumer.org response to HRRC comments and PTZ comments on f.n.7; Microsoft comments on BPDG purpose of government action; HRRC response to Microsoft. (May 30-31, 2002)

Tab P-13: Microsoft comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report (May 31, 2002)

Tab P-14: WJR Consulting remarks on BPDG process and parallel group; Tom Poe's additional comments

Tab P-15: CCIA comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report and BPDG process (May 31, 2002)

Tab P-16: Final Thomson comment for BPDG Co-Chairs Final Report (June 2, 2002)