BROADCAST PROTECTION DISCUSSION GROUP
HOME PAGE
June 6, 2002
BPDG REPORT {Full Report}
OCPS Compliance Rules
OCPS Term Sheet
OCPS - Philips
Tab A: 5C Presentation to CPTWG: Protecting Against Unauthorized Redistribution
of Digital Broadcast Content by Intel, Hitachi, Matsushita, Sony and Toshiba
- Nov. 28, 2002
Tab
B: Draft Proposal and Work Plan for CPTWG "Broadcast Protection Discussion
Group"
Tab C-1: Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document - Final Discussion
Draft, June 3, 2002 (Requirements for the Protection of Unencrypted Digital
Terrestrial Broadcast Content Against Unauthorized Redistribution)
Tab C-2: Table A to Requirements Document
Tab D: Rider X.2 Prepared by Certain MPAA Company Representatives to the BPDG
Drafting Committee Discussion Draft -- February 15, 2002
Tab E: Rider X.2 Prepared by CE and IT Representatives to the BPDG Drafting
Committee
Discussion Draft -- February 15, 2002
Tab F-1: 5C/MPAA/CIG Proposal Table A Criteria - April 25, 2002
Tab F-2: Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document - April 25, 2002
proposal by 5C/MPAA/CIG
Tab G: Philips Proposed Table A Criteria
Tab H-1: DTLA assertion of DTCP qualification for Table A
Tab H-2: DTCP Associated Obligations
Tab I-1: DCP assertion of HDCP qualification for Table A
Tab I-2: HDCP Associated Obligations
Tab J-1: 4C assertion of CPRM qualifications for Table A
Tab J-2: CPRM Associated Obligations
Tab K-1: JVC assertion of D-VHS qualifications for Table
Tab K-2: D-VHS Associated Obligations
Tab L-1: Microsoft assertion of Windows DRM qualifications for Table A
Tab L-2: Windows DRM Associated Obligations
Tab M-1: Philips assertion of OCPS qualifications for Table A
Tab M-2: OCPS Associated Obligations
Tab N-1: EFF Comments on April 25, 2002 Requirements Document
Tab O: Digimarc Comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report (May 28, 2002)
Tab P-01: WJRConsulting comments on May 21, 2002 Requirement Draft
Tab P-02: CableLabs comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report (May 24, 2002)
Tab P-03: Sharplabs comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report (May 29, 2002)
Tab P-04: Comments Submitted by Philips, Thomson and Zenith on the BPDG Co-Chairs'
Report (May 29, 2002)
Tab P-05: Emails from VOSN, Sharp, DigitalConsumer.org, EFF, and Microsoft
supporting the Philips, Thomson, and Zenith comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final
Report
Tab P-06: Letter from CEA supporting "fair use" preamble to BPDG
report (May 16, 2002)
Tab P-07: MPAA comments on the BPDG Co-Chairs' Report (May 17, 2002)
Tab P-08: MPAA Proposed revisions to Compliance and Robustness Requirements
Document (May 29, 2002)
Tab P-09: 5C comments regarding MPAA proposed revisions to Compliance and
Robustness Requirements Document (May 29, 2002)
Tab P-10: Zenith and Philips comments (separate emails) on MPAA proposed revisions
to Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document (May 29, 2002)
Tab P-11: Sharp comments on Compliance and Robustness Requirements Document
(re: deletion of "consumer"), and Philips note in support of Sharp's
comment
Tab P-12: HRRC comment on f.n. 7 of Compliance and Robustness Requirements
Document (re antitrust); Philips, Thomson and Zenith response to HRRC comment
on f.n.7; DigitalConsumer.org response to HRRC comments and PTZ comments on
f.n.7; Microsoft comments on BPDG purpose of government action; HRRC response
to Microsoft. (May 30-31, 2002)
Tab P-13: Microsoft comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report (May 31, 2002)
Tab P-14: WJR Consulting remarks on BPDG process and parallel group; Tom Poe's
additional comments
Tab P-15: CCIA comments on BPDG Co-Chairs' Final Report and BPDG process (May
31, 2002)
Tab P-16: Final Thomson comment for BPDG Co-Chairs Final Report (June 2, 2002)